The content and SEO agencies worth shortlisting if you sell B2B software, and who each one is actually right for.
Last updated
Trusted by enterprise SaaS since 2016
Every agency says it does SaaS content. Far fewer can point to named clients, real numbers, and content that still ranks a year later. Full disclosure, this is Wordify's site, so we've put ourselves first and shown you the data behind that. We've also given an honest, useful read on the others, because a list that only trashes the competition isn't worth citing.
Two things changed about buying content in the last two years
The first is that producing competent text stopped being scarce. A language model will write you a structurally correct 1,500 word post in a minute, which means volume is no longer evidence of anything and an agency's production capacity is worth far less than it was in 2023. What is still scarce is a defensible position, original data, and the judgment to know which topics are worth owning at all.
The second is that a growing share of B2B research now happens inside AI assistants rather than a results page. Being quoted in a generated answer is not the same skill as ranking, and it rewards clean structure, specific claims and being the primary source for a fact. Most agency websites now assert they do this. Far fewer can describe the mechanics when you ask a follow-up question, which makes it a useful filter during the pitch.
What these agencies actually cost
Almost nobody in this category publishes a rate card, which makes budgeting harder than it needs to be. Two of the agencies here are exceptions: Omniscient lists engagements from $10,000 a month on its own site, and Wordify starts at $5,999. Everyone else quotes on request, and in practice the established names cluster around and above the $10,000 mark, often with a twelve month term attached.
The bands are more useful than the numbers. Below roughly $3,000 a month you are buying writing: you brief, they produce. That is a fair purchase if you already have a strategy and simply lack hands, and a poor one if you do not, because you will receive competent articles aimed at nothing in particular. Between about $5,000 and $10,000 you are buying strategy plus production, which is where most B2B software companies land. Above that you are paying for distribution, original research, or genuine subject matter depth in a hard category.
Watch the term length as closely as the rate. A twelve month agreement is usually offered with a discount, and the discount is real, but content takes three to six months to show in search, so an annual commitment means signing before you can judge the work. A three month term costs a few percent more and tells you the same thing.
What that means for your shortlist
Weight your evaluation toward things a model cannot do for free. Ask who conducts the customer interviews, where the original data comes from, and which of the agency's own pages rank for terms buyers actually search. Ask what they would refuse to write for you and why.
Price is a weaker signal than it used to be. The gap between a $4,000 retainer and a $12,000 one used to be volume; now it is more often seniority and research depth, which is harder to see in a proposal and much easier to see in five published pages.
How we chose
Proof over promises. Real case studies with named clients and numbers, not just a wall of logos.
Senior execution. The people who win the work should be the ones doing it, not a junior pool.
Search and AI visibility. Content that ranks on Google and gets cited when buyers ask AI tools for recommendations.
Fit for B2B SaaS. Real experience with technical products, long sales cycles, and a defined ICP.
Fair terms. Transparent pricing and commitments you can actually exit if the fit is wrong.
1
Wordify
That's us
Best for B2B SaaS teams that want senior-led content and SEO without a big-agency retainer.
The lean, senior-led option. Wordify runs SEO, GEO and content as one programme for B2B software, and the senior people who scope the work are the people who do it. No junior handoff, no year-long lock-in, and pricing that starts well below the larger agencies on this list.<br><br>The specialism is technical: containers and DevOps for BoxBoat before IBM acquired them, headless CMS architecture for dotCMS, and over 570 articles for CMS Wire, a publication whose readers work in the category full time. Where a topic exceeds what a writer can responsibly cover, the process is a recorded interview with one of your engineers before an outline exists, and a technical read from that same person before the draft reaches marketing.<br><br>Where we fit: B2B software companies whose buyers are practitioners, and teams that want to prove the model on a three-month term rather than commit to a year. Where we may not: if you need paid media, design and demand gen under one roof, a full-service shop will serve you better, and we will say so on the call rather than take the retainer.
34+ SaaS companies trusted with their thought leadership and content since 2016
Clients include Shopify, Storyblok, Sitecore, dotCMS, and Atlan
dotCMS saved $172K+ a year in ad spend through organic and AI search
Core dna grew organic traffic 227%
Rated 4.6 out of 5 across 13 reviews on G2
SEO, GEO, and content from $5,999 a month on a 3-month term
Founded in 2015 and probably the best known content agency in B2B SaaS, Animalz built its reputation on editorial craft rather than search mechanics. The writing is genuinely good, the newsletter and podcast have real audiences, and the brand carries weight in a pitch to your CEO.<br><br>Their own site shows where their attention goes. The strongest organic asset they own is a free SEO forecasting tool, and a chunk of their traffic comes from glossary terms unrelated to agency selection. That is a content brand strategy rather than a lead-capture one, and it works for them.<br><br>Where they fit: you want long-form thought leadership that a senior audience will actually finish, and you have the budget for an enterprise retainer. Where they may not: if your priority is ranking commercial pages and generating demo requests this quarter, you are buying a Rolls-Royce to do the school run. Worth knowing they are large enough that the people in your pitch and the people on your account are not automatically the same.
3
Omniscient Digital
Best for SEO-led growth tied to pipeline.
Omniscient positions around revenue rather than rankings, and they are unusually willing to say so publicly, including listing engagements from $10,000 a month on their own site. That transparency is rarer than it should be in this category and makes qualifying fast.<br><br>The model is SEO-led: keyword and topic selection drive the plan, and the content follows the opportunity. If you already believe organic is your channel and you want someone to run it properly rather than argue about strategy, that is an efficient fit.<br><br>Where they fit: five-figure monthly budgets, a revenue-first brief, and a team that will not need convincing that search is worth the wait. Where they may not: smaller budgets, or teams that need content for sales enablement and brand as much as for search. At that price point you should also expect to be one of a modest number of accounts, so ask directly how many they run per strategist.
4
Siege Media
Best for high-volume content and digital PR at enterprise scale.
Around 70 people, which makes Siege one of the larger specialists in this list, and the capability set reflects that: content production at volume, technical SEO, and a genuine digital PR function that earns links rather than buying them. For enterprise brands that need a lot of output across several channels, few boutiques can match the throughput.<br><br>Their own content ranks well for competitive comparison terms, which is a reasonable proxy for whether an SEO agency can do SEO.<br><br>Where they fit: enterprise budgets, high volume requirements, and a brief that includes link acquisition and PR alongside writing. Where they may not: if you want a small senior team who know your product deeply, scale cuts against you. The tradeoff at any agency this size is that seniority is spread across many accounts, so the question worth asking is who specifically is assigned and what else they carry.
5
Grow and Convert
Best for bottom-funnel, conversion-focused content.
Grow and Convert built a methodology, Pain Point SEO, and then built the agency around it. The argument is that most content targets top-of-funnel terms that attract readers who will never buy, and that the money sits in the smaller, uglier, high-intent queries instead. It is a real position, argued publicly and at length, and you can evaluate it before you ever take a call.<br><br>They practise it too. A single service page of theirs ranks at or near the top for head commercial terms in this category, which is the method demonstrating itself.<br><br>Where they fit: teams that would rather have 300 visitors who are evaluating vendors than 30,000 who are not, and who want conversion tracked rather than assumed. Where they may not: if you need brand-building thought leadership, or volume across many topics, the bottom-funnel focus is a constraint by design. Pricing is quoted on request.
6
Campfire Labs
Best for research and customer-story content.
Campfire Labs is built around interview-led content: customer stories, original research, and pieces that get their authority from primary sources rather than from summarising what already ranks. That is a slower and more expensive way to produce content, and it is also the way that survives an audience of practitioners.<br><br>They are a small team, so the retainer buys fewer assets than a production shop would deliver. If you have been burned by content that reads like it was assembled from the first page of Google, that tradeoff will make sense to you.<br><br>Where they fit: a handful of high-craft assets a quarter, a category where credibility is the constraint, and a willingness to give them access to your customers. Where they may not: if you need volume, or if getting customer interviews signed off internally is going to take three months, the model stalls on your side rather than theirs.
7
Foundation
Best for content distribution and reach.
Foundation's distinguishing argument is that most companies over-invest in creating content and under-invest in making sure anyone sees it. They pair creation with distribution and amplification, and maintain a substantial public library of research and frameworks that doubles as proof they can do the work.<br><br>Where they fit: you already publish reasonable content and the problem is reach, or you want research-led assets that earn attention and links rather than just rank. Where they may not: if your gap is technical depth in a narrow category, distribution expertise does not solve it. It is also worth being clear internally about what you will do with reach once you have it, because attention that arrives without a conversion path is a vanity outcome.
8
Ten Speed
Best for narrow, senior organic growth.
Ten Speed stays deliberately narrow: SEO and content for B2B, founder-led, with senior operators rather than a production line. Agencies that refuse to expand their service menu are usually doing it because breadth dilutes the thing they are good at, and that discipline is worth something when you are buying judgment rather than hands.<br><br>Where they fit: teams that want a small number of experienced people close to the work, and who do not need paid media, design or demand gen bundled in. Where they may not: if your requirement spans several channels you will end up managing multiple vendors, which is a real coordination cost. Smaller agencies also have less slack, so ask what happens to your timeline if someone is unavailable for a fortnight.
What to look for, whoever you pick
A named writer, not a pool. Ask who writes the first draft, whether they are employed or contracted, and how many other accounts they carry. Agencies with a clean answer give it immediately.
Five live URLs from the last six months. Published work is the product; case studies are marketing about the product. Read five pieces in a comparable category and check whether any of them takes a position.
A process for topics the writer does not know. The honest answer involves interviewing your engineers. Anything else produces content your technical audience will spot in two paragraphs.
Traffic numbers with a denominator. Growth percentages are trivial to inflate from a low base. Ask which queries, which pages, and what happened to demo requests over the same window.
Losses they can describe. Every agency with real client history has pieces that failed. The ones that can name three and say what they changed are running an actual feedback loop.
An exit that does not cost you a year. Content takes three to six months to show in search. A twelve month term means committing before you can judge the work; a three month term costs a few percent more and tells you the same thing.
Questions to ask before you sign
Who writes my first draft, and what else are they working on? Separates agencies that staff senior from agencies that pitch senior and deliver freelance.
Show me five things you published in the last six months for a similar client. The single highest-signal request in the whole process, and the one weak agencies stall on.
What happens when a topic is beyond your writer's expertise? You are listening for a subject matter expert interview process, and for how much of your team's time it needs.
Which of your own pages rank for the terms you would target for me? An agency selling search visibility that has none invites the obvious question.
What would you refuse to do for us, and why? Tests whether you are buying judgment or agreement. Agencies without a point of view accept every idea in the brief.
What does month four look like if this is working? Most retainers are cancelled at month four, immediately before search results usually arrive. Agree the milestone before you sign.
Who owns the content if we leave, and on what notice? The answer should be that you own everything outright, with no licence back and no attribution requirement.
